Evolve it
What new idea does this inspire?

Inspiration of this Idea (1)

  1.  
 

Ideas Inspired by This (0)

To prove a liar a liar, he has to agree with your truth.

Not to pick on Bill Clinton too much, but his famous legal dodge "depending on what the meaning of is is" will go down in history for me as the ultimate proof of the flexibility of language when push comes to shove. Now we might excuse Clinton on many grounds: he's in an adversarial system with agressive adversaries, the law is a primitive entity with specific definitions that never quite match reality, or that we're just sympathetic to his version of the facts. Clinton's case aside, why can we rarely pin down a liar?

There was a moment in the presidential election of 2000 where, after a debate, we followed the CNN camera directly into the "Spin Room". Isn't "spin" a close relative of lie? Yes, but that relationship is the very reason why we can never bring the mendacious to justice. Is it a lie to say that Bush won the first debate? Ok, well if not, it must be a lie to say Gore won? No, that's not clear either. In the spin room that day, as the camera shifted from one high-ranking spinner to the next, the proximity of the clashing points of view was so extreme that I was left with a feeling of deep cynicism. I now believe that the truth is just an inconvenient interruption to the aggressive propagandizing that dominates public dialog.

Sorry that I can't shatter the confusion myself, I can only rant. But the existence of the spin room is an outright admission of American culture's inability to call a liar a liar. No matter how baldfaced, someone will insist he's telling the truth and democratically speaking, apparently that's enough.